Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 330-339.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.10.003
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yanjie Xu1, Yining Ying1, Shuhong Ouyang2, Xiaoliang Duan2, Hui Sun2, Shukun Jiang3, Shichen Sun3, Jinsong Bao1()
Received:
2018-05-21
Accepted:
2018-07-26
Online:
2018-11-28
Published:
2018-08-20
Yanjie Xu, Yining Ying, Shuhong Ouyang, Xiaoliang Duan, Hui Sun, Shukun Jiang, Shichen Sun, Jinsong Bao. Factors Affecting Sensory Quality of Cooked japonica Rice[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(6): 330-339.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Location | Month | Temperature | Sunshine duration (h) | Rainfall |
---|---|---|---|---|
(ºC) | (mm) | |||
Xiangshui | May | 14.7 | 197.5 | 89.3 |
June | 18.3 | 197.2 | 132.8 | |
July | 22.4 | 222.9 | 62 | |
August | 21.5 | 228.2 | 98.1 | |
September | 15.8 | 137 | 88 | |
October | 4.5 | 155.7 | 45.9 | |
Hangzhou | May | 21.4 | 251.7 | 126.6 |
June | 25.1 | 282.5 | 105.8 | |
July | 30.5 | 279.6 | 202.4 | |
August | 25.1 | 282.5 | 105.8 | |
September | 24.6 | 247.5 | 120.8 | |
October | 20.5 | 145.9 | 33.8 |
Table 1 Environmental conditions in Xiangshui, Heilongjiang Province and Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province in China during May to October in 2016.
Location | Month | Temperature | Sunshine duration (h) | Rainfall |
---|---|---|---|---|
(ºC) | (mm) | |||
Xiangshui | May | 14.7 | 197.5 | 89.3 |
June | 18.3 | 197.2 | 132.8 | |
July | 22.4 | 222.9 | 62 | |
August | 21.5 | 228.2 | 98.1 | |
September | 15.8 | 137 | 88 | |
October | 4.5 | 155.7 | 45.9 | |
Hangzhou | May | 21.4 | 251.7 | 126.6 |
June | 25.1 | 282.5 | 105.8 | |
July | 30.5 | 279.6 | 202.4 | |
August | 25.1 | 282.5 | 105.8 | |
September | 24.6 | 247.5 | 120.8 | |
October | 20.5 | 145.9 | 33.8 |
Location | Variety | Smell | Appearance | Texture | Taste | Texture of cold rice | Overall score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Glossiness | Integrity | Stickiness | Elasticity | Hardness | |||||||
Xiangshui | LD18 | 16.0 a | 6.7 a | 7.8 a | 4.9 a | 7.6 a | 8.1 a | 8.1 a | 23.6 a | 3.3 a | 86.1 a | |
LD20 | 14.9 b | 6.4 ab | 7.1 b | 4.4 ab | 7.4 ab | 7.4 b | 8.1 a | 21.4 b | 3.2 a | 80.3 b | ||
LD30 | 16.7 a | 5.8 c | 5.8 c | 4.4 ab | 5.9 d | 6.3 c | 6.7 c | 19.7 d | 2.9 b | 74.1 cd | ||
Mean | 15.9 * | 6.3 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 7 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 21.6 | 3.1 | 80.2 | ||
Hangzhou | LD18 | 14.1 b | 5.5 c | 5.9 c | 4.1 b | 6.9 bc | 5.8 c | 8.1 a | 21.6 b | 3.1 ab | 75.2 c | |
LD20 | 11.3 c | 5.9 bc | 5.6 c | 4.1 b | 7.4 ab | 7.3 b | 7.8 ab | 20.4 c | 3.0 ab | 72.9 d | ||
LD30 | 14.4 b | 5.9 bc | 5.9 c | 3.6 c | 6.4 cd | 5.8 c | 7.3 b | 20.6 c | 3.0 ab | 72.9 d | ||
Mean | 13.3 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 3.9 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 20.9 | 3 | 73.7 |
Table 2 Sensory attributes of three rice varieties in two growing locations (Xiangshui and Hangzhou in China).
Location | Variety | Smell | Appearance | Texture | Taste | Texture of cold rice | Overall score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Glossiness | Integrity | Stickiness | Elasticity | Hardness | |||||||
Xiangshui | LD18 | 16.0 a | 6.7 a | 7.8 a | 4.9 a | 7.6 a | 8.1 a | 8.1 a | 23.6 a | 3.3 a | 86.1 a | |
LD20 | 14.9 b | 6.4 ab | 7.1 b | 4.4 ab | 7.4 ab | 7.4 b | 8.1 a | 21.4 b | 3.2 a | 80.3 b | ||
LD30 | 16.7 a | 5.8 c | 5.8 c | 4.4 ab | 5.9 d | 6.3 c | 6.7 c | 19.7 d | 2.9 b | 74.1 cd | ||
Mean | 15.9 * | 6.3 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 7 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 21.6 | 3.1 | 80.2 | ||
Hangzhou | LD18 | 14.1 b | 5.5 c | 5.9 c | 4.1 b | 6.9 bc | 5.8 c | 8.1 a | 21.6 b | 3.1 ab | 75.2 c | |
LD20 | 11.3 c | 5.9 bc | 5.6 c | 4.1 b | 7.4 ab | 7.3 b | 7.8 ab | 20.4 c | 3.0 ab | 72.9 d | ||
LD30 | 14.4 b | 5.9 bc | 5.9 c | 3.6 c | 6.4 cd | 5.8 c | 7.3 b | 20.6 c | 3.0 ab | 72.9 d | ||
Mean | 13.3 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 3.9 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 20.9 | 3 | 73.7 |
Location | Variety | AAC | Protein content | Lipid content |
---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 19.8 b | 6.2 d | 0.27 ab |
LD20 | 20.4 a | 6.2 d | 0.19 b | |
LD30 | 17.5 c | 8.0 c | 0.36 ab | |
Mean | 19.2 * | 6.8 * | 0.27 | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 17.0 cd | 9.1 b | 0.27 ab |
LD20 | 16.9 d | 9.3 ab | 0.29 ab | |
LD30 | 13.2 e | 9.5 a | 0.41 a | |
Mean | 15.7 | 9.3 | 0.32 |
Table 3 Apparent amylose content (AAC), protein and lipid contents of three rice varieties in two environments. %
Location | Variety | AAC | Protein content | Lipid content |
---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 19.8 b | 6.2 d | 0.27 ab |
LD20 | 20.4 a | 6.2 d | 0.19 b | |
LD30 | 17.5 c | 8.0 c | 0.36 ab | |
Mean | 19.2 * | 6.8 * | 0.27 | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 17.0 cd | 9.1 b | 0.27 ab |
LD20 | 16.9 d | 9.3 ab | 0.29 ab | |
LD30 | 13.2 e | 9.5 a | 0.41 a | |
Mean | 15.7 | 9.3 | 0.32 |
Location | Variety | PV (RVU) | HPV (RVU) | CPV (RVU) | BD (RVU) | SB (RVU) | HD (g) | COH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 173.0 b | 93.4 b | 176.0 c | 79.6 a | 3.0 a | 16.9 a | 0.48 c |
LD20 | 173.3 b | 93.7 b | 175.3 c | 79.5 a | 2.1 a | 16.0 a | 0.54 b | |
LD30 | 178.7 b | 98.8 b | 179.4 c | 80.0 a | 0.7 a | 10.9 b | 0.48 c | |
Mean | 175.0 * | 95.3 * | 176.9 | 79.7 | 1.9 | 14.6 * | 0.50 * | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 226.5 a | 158.1 a | 232.7 a | 68.3 a | 6.3 a | 7.5 c | 0.60 a |
LD20 | 228.3 a | 161.5 a | 234.2 a | 66.8 a | 5.8 a | 6.8 c | 0.61 a | |
LD30 | 224.1 a | 142.5 a | 198.8 b | 81.6 a | -25.4 b | 6.6 c | 0.55 b | |
Mean | 226.3 | 154 | 221.9 | 72.2 | -4.4 | 7 | 0.59 |
Table 4 Pasting viscosity and gel texture of three rice varieties in two environments.
Location | Variety | PV (RVU) | HPV (RVU) | CPV (RVU) | BD (RVU) | SB (RVU) | HD (g) | COH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 173.0 b | 93.4 b | 176.0 c | 79.6 a | 3.0 a | 16.9 a | 0.48 c |
LD20 | 173.3 b | 93.7 b | 175.3 c | 79.5 a | 2.1 a | 16.0 a | 0.54 b | |
LD30 | 178.7 b | 98.8 b | 179.4 c | 80.0 a | 0.7 a | 10.9 b | 0.48 c | |
Mean | 175.0 * | 95.3 * | 176.9 | 79.7 | 1.9 | 14.6 * | 0.50 * | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 226.5 a | 158.1 a | 232.7 a | 68.3 a | 6.3 a | 7.5 c | 0.60 a |
LD20 | 228.3 a | 161.5 a | 234.2 a | 66.8 a | 5.8 a | 6.8 c | 0.61 a | |
LD30 | 224.1 a | 142.5 a | 198.8 b | 81.6 a | -25.4 b | 6.6 c | 0.55 b | |
Mean | 226.3 | 154 | 221.9 | 72.2 | -4.4 | 7 | 0.59 |
Location | Variety | To (oC) | Tp (oC) | Tc (oC) | ΔH (J/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 58.0 c | 65.8 c | 73.8 b | 6.6 ab |
LD20 | 57.2 d | 65.4 c | 72.6 b | 6.0 b | |
LD30 | 57.1 d | 65.3 c | 73.2 b | 6.5 ab | |
Mean | 57.4 * | 65.5 * | 73.5 * | 6.4 * | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 63.7 a | 70.7 ab | 78.3 a | 7.4 a |
LD20 | 63.8 a | 71.3 a | 78.8 a | 7.1 a | |
LD30 | 63.1 b | 70.5 b | 78.4 a | 7.3 a | |
Mean | 63.5 | 70.8 | 78.5 | 7.3 |
Table 5 Thermal properties of the three rice varieties in the two environments.
Location | Variety | To (oC) | Tp (oC) | Tc (oC) | ΔH (J/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | LD18 | 58.0 c | 65.8 c | 73.8 b | 6.6 ab |
LD20 | 57.2 d | 65.4 c | 72.6 b | 6.0 b | |
LD30 | 57.1 d | 65.3 c | 73.2 b | 6.5 ab | |
Mean | 57.4 * | 65.5 * | 73.5 * | 6.4 * | |
Hangzhou | LD18 | 63.7 a | 70.7 ab | 78.3 a | 7.4 a |
LD20 | 63.8 a | 71.3 a | 78.8 a | 7.1 a | |
LD30 | 63.1 b | 70.5 b | 78.4 a | 7.3 a | |
Mean | 63.5 | 70.8 | 78.5 | 7.3 |
Variety | Asp | Thr | Ser | Glu | Gly | Ala | Cys | Val | Met | Ile | Leu | Tyr | Phe | Lys | His | Arg | Pro | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | ||||||||||||||||||
LD18 | 4.38 d | 2.26 bc | 2.58 c | 8.55 c | 2.19 d | 2.86 d | 0.69 b | 2.88 c | 1.08 c | 1.96 c | 4.23 c | 1.05 c | 2.66 c | 1.84 c | 1.30 c | 4.22 c | 1.53 b | 46.3 c |
LD20 | 4.47 cd | 1.99 c | 2.49 c | 8.67 c | 2.26 cd | 3.02 d | 0.78 b | 3.15 c | 1.33 bc | 2.11 c | 4.35 c | 0.91 c | 2.69 c | 1.77 c | 1.27 c | 4.22 c | 1.44 b | 46.9 c |
LD30 | 5.34 bc | 2.57 ab | 3.15 b | 11.52 b | 2.59 c | 3.83 c | 0.85 b | 3.74 b | 1.26 bc | 2.58 b | 5.72 b | 1.48 a | 3.72 b | 2.29 b | 1.82 b | 5.79 b | 2.45 a | 60.7 b |
Mean | 4.73* | 2.27 | 2.74* | 9.58* | 2.35* | 3.24* | 0.77* | 3.26* | 1.22* | 2.22* | 4.77* | 1.15 | 3.02* | 1.97* | 1.46* | 4.74 | 1.81 | 51.3* |
Hangzhou | ||||||||||||||||||
LD18 | 6.21 b | 2.63 ab | 3.46 b | 12.68 b | 3.13 b | 3.98 c | 1.09 a | 4.10 b | 1.57 ab | 2.76 b | 5.92 b | 1.27 b | 4.62 a | 2.50 b | 1.86 b | 6.23 b | 1.37 b | 65.4 b |
LD20 | 7.22 a | 2.98 a | 3.89 a | 14.58 a | 3.51 a | 4.39 b | 1.26 a | 4.57 a | 1.89 a | 3.20 a | 6.84 a | 1.31 ab | 4.57 a | 2.79 a | 2.09 a | 6.83 a | 1.44 b | 73.4 a |
LD30 | 7.44 a | 3.13 a | 4.11 a | 15.46 a | 3.66 a | 4.68 a | 1.18 a | 4.90 a | 1.87 a | 3.42 a | 7.44 a | 1.25 b | 4.84 a | 2.94 a | 2.26 a | 6.87 a | 1.40 b | 76.8 a |
Mean | 6.96 | 2.91 | 3.82 | 14.24 | 3.43 | 4.35 | 1.18 | 4.52 | 1.78 | 3.13 | 6.73 | 1.28 | 4.68 | 2.74 | 2.07 | 6.64 | 1.4 | 71.9 |
Table 6 Free amino acid content of the three rice varieties in the two environments. mg/g
Variety | Asp | Thr | Ser | Glu | Gly | Ala | Cys | Val | Met | Ile | Leu | Tyr | Phe | Lys | His | Arg | Pro | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiangshui | ||||||||||||||||||
LD18 | 4.38 d | 2.26 bc | 2.58 c | 8.55 c | 2.19 d | 2.86 d | 0.69 b | 2.88 c | 1.08 c | 1.96 c | 4.23 c | 1.05 c | 2.66 c | 1.84 c | 1.30 c | 4.22 c | 1.53 b | 46.3 c |
LD20 | 4.47 cd | 1.99 c | 2.49 c | 8.67 c | 2.26 cd | 3.02 d | 0.78 b | 3.15 c | 1.33 bc | 2.11 c | 4.35 c | 0.91 c | 2.69 c | 1.77 c | 1.27 c | 4.22 c | 1.44 b | 46.9 c |
LD30 | 5.34 bc | 2.57 ab | 3.15 b | 11.52 b | 2.59 c | 3.83 c | 0.85 b | 3.74 b | 1.26 bc | 2.58 b | 5.72 b | 1.48 a | 3.72 b | 2.29 b | 1.82 b | 5.79 b | 2.45 a | 60.7 b |
Mean | 4.73* | 2.27 | 2.74* | 9.58* | 2.35* | 3.24* | 0.77* | 3.26* | 1.22* | 2.22* | 4.77* | 1.15 | 3.02* | 1.97* | 1.46* | 4.74 | 1.81 | 51.3* |
Hangzhou | ||||||||||||||||||
LD18 | 6.21 b | 2.63 ab | 3.46 b | 12.68 b | 3.13 b | 3.98 c | 1.09 a | 4.10 b | 1.57 ab | 2.76 b | 5.92 b | 1.27 b | 4.62 a | 2.50 b | 1.86 b | 6.23 b | 1.37 b | 65.4 b |
LD20 | 7.22 a | 2.98 a | 3.89 a | 14.58 a | 3.51 a | 4.39 b | 1.26 a | 4.57 a | 1.89 a | 3.20 a | 6.84 a | 1.31 ab | 4.57 a | 2.79 a | 2.09 a | 6.83 a | 1.44 b | 73.4 a |
LD30 | 7.44 a | 3.13 a | 4.11 a | 15.46 a | 3.66 a | 4.68 a | 1.18 a | 4.90 a | 1.87 a | 3.42 a | 7.44 a | 1.25 b | 4.84 a | 2.94 a | 2.26 a | 6.87 a | 1.40 b | 76.8 a |
Mean | 6.96 | 2.91 | 3.82 | 14.24 | 3.43 | 4.35 | 1.18 | 4.52 | 1.78 | 3.13 | 6.73 | 1.28 | 4.68 | 2.74 | 2.07 | 6.64 | 1.4 | 71.9 |
Trait | AAC | Protein | CPV | HD | COH | Asp | Thr | Gly | Ala | Met | Ile | Lys | His |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smell | 0.298 | -0.572 | -0.819 * | 0.594 | -0.897* | -0.724 | -0.854 * | -0.828 * | -0.134 | -0.841 * | 0.104 | -0.923 ** | -0.884 * |
Color | 0.629 | -0.847 * | -0.695 | 0.864 * | -0.561 | -0.559 | -0.057 | -0.006 | -0.733 | -0.039 | -0.608 | -0.319 | -0.192 |
Glossiness | 0.715 | -0.903 * | -0.665 | 0.921 ** | -0.555 | -0.711 | -0.333 | -0.264 | -0.735 | -0.29 | -0.539 | -0.586 | -0.47 |
Integrity | 0.888 * | -0.842 * | -0.528 | 0.851 * | -0.61 | -0.937 ** | -0.242 | -0.181 | -0.751 | -0.264 | -0.659 | -0.505 | -0.362 |
Stickiness | 0.575 | -0.446 | 0.1 | 0.441 | 0.253 | -0.175 | 0.404 | 0.462 | -0.693 | 0.436 | -0.713 | 0.19 | 0.287 |
Elasticity | 0.755 | -0.738 | -0.379 | 0.742 | -0.309 | -0.534 | 0.284 | 0.335 | -0.830* | 0.269 | -0.831 * | -0.003 | 0.147 |
Hardness | 0.481 | -0.335 | 0.227 | 0.327 | 0.393 | -0.112 | 0.187 | 0.254 | -0.552 | 0.256 | -0.518 | 0.031 | 0.092 |
Taste | 0.516 | -0.598 | -0.24 | 0.63 | -0.243 | -0.597 | -0.352 | -0.303 | -0.482 | -0.332 | -0.316 | -0.498 | -0.455 |
Texture of cold rice | 0.656 | -0.727 | -0.319 | 0.739 | -0.186 | -0.528 | -0.201 | -0.126 | -0.689 | -0.141 | -0.529 | -0.42 | -0.329 |
Overall score | 0.763 | -0.890 * | -0.594 | 0.910 * | -0.545 | -0.794 | -0.351 | -0.282 | -0.735 | -0.324 | -0.553 | -0.601 | -0.485 |
Table 7 Correlations between sensory attributes and physicochemical properties.
Trait | AAC | Protein | CPV | HD | COH | Asp | Thr | Gly | Ala | Met | Ile | Lys | His |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smell | 0.298 | -0.572 | -0.819 * | 0.594 | -0.897* | -0.724 | -0.854 * | -0.828 * | -0.134 | -0.841 * | 0.104 | -0.923 ** | -0.884 * |
Color | 0.629 | -0.847 * | -0.695 | 0.864 * | -0.561 | -0.559 | -0.057 | -0.006 | -0.733 | -0.039 | -0.608 | -0.319 | -0.192 |
Glossiness | 0.715 | -0.903 * | -0.665 | 0.921 ** | -0.555 | -0.711 | -0.333 | -0.264 | -0.735 | -0.29 | -0.539 | -0.586 | -0.47 |
Integrity | 0.888 * | -0.842 * | -0.528 | 0.851 * | -0.61 | -0.937 ** | -0.242 | -0.181 | -0.751 | -0.264 | -0.659 | -0.505 | -0.362 |
Stickiness | 0.575 | -0.446 | 0.1 | 0.441 | 0.253 | -0.175 | 0.404 | 0.462 | -0.693 | 0.436 | -0.713 | 0.19 | 0.287 |
Elasticity | 0.755 | -0.738 | -0.379 | 0.742 | -0.309 | -0.534 | 0.284 | 0.335 | -0.830* | 0.269 | -0.831 * | -0.003 | 0.147 |
Hardness | 0.481 | -0.335 | 0.227 | 0.327 | 0.393 | -0.112 | 0.187 | 0.254 | -0.552 | 0.256 | -0.518 | 0.031 | 0.092 |
Taste | 0.516 | -0.598 | -0.24 | 0.63 | -0.243 | -0.597 | -0.352 | -0.303 | -0.482 | -0.332 | -0.316 | -0.498 | -0.455 |
Texture of cold rice | 0.656 | -0.727 | -0.319 | 0.739 | -0.186 | -0.528 | -0.201 | -0.126 | -0.689 | -0.141 | -0.529 | -0.42 | -0.329 |
Overall score | 0.763 | -0.890 * | -0.594 | 0.910 * | -0.545 | -0.794 | -0.351 | -0.282 | -0.735 | -0.324 | -0.553 | -0.601 | -0.485 |
[1] | Aboubacar A, Moldenhauer K A K, Mcclung A M, Beighley D H, Hamaker B R.2006. Effect of growth location in the united states on amylose content, amylopectin fine structure, and thermal properties of starches of long grain rice cultivars.Cereal Chem, 83(1): 93-98. |
[2] | Ahmed N, Tetlow I J, Nawaz S, Iqbal A, Mubin M, Shah N U R M, Butt A, Lightfood D A, Maekawa M.2015. Effect of high temperature on grain filling period, yield, amylose content and activity of starch biosynthesis enzymes in endosperm of basmati rice.J Sci Food Agric, 95(11): 2237-2243. |
[3] | Balindong J L, Ward R M, Liu L, Rose T J, Pallas L A, Ovenden B W, Snell P J, Waters D L E.2018. Rice grain protein composition influences instrumental measures of rice cooking and eating quality.J Cereal Sci, 79: 35-42. |
[4] | Bao J S, Zheng X W, Xia Y W, He P, Shu Q Y, Lu X, Chen Y, Zhu L H.2000. QTL mapping for the paste viscosity characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 100(2): 280-284. |
[5] | Bao J S, Kong X L, Xie J K, Xu L J.2004. Analysis of genotypic and environmental effects on rice starch: I. Apparent amylose content, pasting viscosity, and gel texture.J Agric Food Chem, 52: 6010-6016. |
[6] | Bao J S, Shen S Q, Sun M, Corke H.2006. Analysis of genotypic diversity in the starch physicochemical properties of nonwaxy rice: Apparent amylose content, pasting viscosity and gel texture.Starch Starke, 58(6): 259-267. |
[7] | Bao J S.2008. Accurate measurement of pasting temperature by the rapid visco-analyser: A case study using rice flour.Rice Sci, 15(1): 69-72. |
[8] | Bao J S.2012. Toward understanding the genetic and molecular bases of the eating and cooking qualities of rice.Cereal Foods World, 57(4): 148-156. |
[9] | Beckles D M, Thitisaksakul M.2014. How environmental stress affects starch composition and functionality in cereal endosperm.Starch Starke, 66: 58-71. |
[10] | Bhat F M, Riar C S.2016. Physicochemical, cooking, and textural characteristics of grains of different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars of temperate region of India and their interrelationships. J Text Stud, 48(2): 160-170. |
[11] | Caffagni A, Albertazzi G, Gavina G, Ravaglia S, Gianinetti A, Pecchioni N, Milc J.2013. Characterization of an Italian rice germplasm collection with genetic markers useful for breeding to improve eating and cooking quality.Euphytica, 194(3): 383-399. |
[12] | Champagne E T, Bett K L, Vinyard B T, Webb B D, Mcclung A M, Barton F E, Lyon B G, Moldenhauer K, Linscombe S, Kohlwey D.1997. Effects of drying conditions, final moisture content, and degree of milling on rice flavor.Cereal Chem, 74(5): 566-570. |
[13] | Chen M H, Bergman C, Pinson S, Fjellstrom R.2008. Gene haplotypes: Associations with apparent amylose content and the effect by the environment in an international rice germplasm collection.J Cereal Sci, 47(3): 536-545. |
[14] | Chun A, Lee H J, Hamaker B R, Janaswamy S.2015. Effects of ripening temperature on starch structure and gelatinization, pasting, and cooking properties in rice (Oryza sativa). J Agric Food Chem, 63: 3085-3093. |
[15] | Dou Z, Tang S, Chen W Z, Zhang H X, Li G H, Liu Z H, Ding C Q, Chen L, Wang S H, Zhang H C, Ding Y F.2018. Effects of open-field warming during grain-filling stage on grain quality of twojaponica rice cultivars in lower reaches of Yangtze River delta. J Cereal Sci, 81: 118-126. |
[16] | Gayin J, Abdel-Aal E S M, Manful J, Bertoft E, Marcone M, Ragaee S.2017. Physical, cooking and thermal properties of African rice (Oryza glaberrima), and its starch digestibility in vitro. LWT: Food Sci Technol, 75: 481-487. |
[17] | Honjyo K.2008. Studies on protein content in rice grain: I. Variation of protein content between rice varieties and the influences of environmental factors on the protein content.Jpn J Crop Sci, 40: 183-189. |
[18] | Hori K, Suzuki K, Iijima K, Ebana K.2016. Variation in cooking and eating quality traits in Japanese rice germplasm accessions.Breeding Sci, 66(2): 309-318. |
[19] | Jin L, Lu Y, Shao Y F, Zhang G, Xiao P, Shen S Q, Croke H, Bao J S.2010. Molecular marker assisted selection for improvement of the eating, cooking and sensory quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Cereal Sci, 51(1): 159-164. |
[20] | Kaur P, Pal P, Virdi A S, Kaur A, Singh N, Mahajan G.2016. Protein and starch characteristics of milled rice from different cultivars affected by transplantation date.J Food Sci Technol, 53(8): 3186-3196. |
[21] | Kim H, Kim O W, Kwak H S, Kim S S, Lee H J.2017. Prediction model of rice eating quality using physicochemical properties and sensory quality evaluation.J Sens Stud, 32(4): e12273. |
[22] | Kim S S, Lee S E, Kim O W, Dong C K.2000. Physicochemical characteristics of chalky kernels and their effects on sensory quality of cooked rice.Cereal Chem, 77(3): 376-379. |
[23] | Kong X L, Zhu P, Sui Z Q, Bao J S.2015. Physicochemical properties of starches from diverse rice cultivars varying in apparent amylose content and gelatinisation temperature combinations.Food Chem, 172: 433-440. |
[24] | Li K H, Bao J S, Corke H, Sun M.2016. Genotypic diversity and environmental stability of starch physicochemical properties in the USDA rice mini-core collection.Food Chem, 221: 1186-1196. |
[25] | Lin C J, Li C Y, Lin S K, Yang F H, Huang J J, Liu Y H, Lur H S.2010. Influence of high temperature during grain filling on the accumulation of storage proteins and grain quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Food Chem, 58: 10545-10552. |
[26] | Lu S, Cik T T, Lii C Y, Lai P, Chen H H.2013. Effect of amylose content on structure, texture and α-amylase reactivity of cooked rice.LWT: Food Sci Technol, 54(1): 224-228. |
[27] | Matsuzaki A, Takano T, Sakamoto S, Kuboyama T.1992. Relation between eating quality and chemical components in milled rice and amino acid contents in cooked rice.Jpn J Crop Sci, 61(4): 561-567. |
[28] | Mestres C, Ribeyre F, Pons B, Fallet V, Matencio F.2011. Sensory texture of cooked rice is rather linked to chemical than to physical characteristics of raw grain.J Cereal Sci, 53(1): 81-89. |
[29] | Meullenet J F, Griffin V K, Carson K, Davis G, Davis S, Gross J, Hankins J A, Sailer E, Sitakalin C, Suwansri S, Vasquez Caicedo A L.2001. Rice external preference mapping for Asian consumers living in the United States.J Sens Stud, 16(1): 73-94. |
[30] | Nakamura S, Satoh H, Ohtsubo K.2011. Characteristics of pregelatinizedae mutant rice flours prepared by boiling after preroasting. J Agric Food Chem, 59(19): 10665-10676. |
[31] | Nakamura S, Cui J, Zhang X, Yang F, Xu X M, Sheng H, Ohtsubo K.2016. Comparison of eating quality and physicochemical properties between Japanese and Chinese rice cultivars.Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 80: 2437-2449. |
[32] | Park J K, Kim S S, Kim K O.2001. Effect of milling ratio on sensory properties of cooked rice and on physicochemical properties of milled and cooked rice.Cereal Chem, 78: 151-156. |
[33] | Patindol J A, Siebenmorgen T J, Wang Y J.2015. Impact of environmental factors on rice starch structure: A review.Starch Starke, 67: 42-54. |
[34] | Shen S Q, Wang Y, Li M, Xu F F, Chai L H, Bao J S.2015. The effect of anaerobic treatment on polyphenols, antioxidant properties, tocols and free amino acids in white, red, and black germinated rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Funct Foods, 19: 641-648. |
[35] | Sodhi N S, Singh N.2003. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches separated from rice cultivars grown in India.Food Chem, 80(1): 99-108. |
[36] | Song E H, Jeong J, Park C Y, Kim H Y, Kim E H, Bang E, Hong Y S.2018. Metabotyping of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for understanding its intrinsic physiology and potential eating quality. Food Res Int, 111: 20-30. |
[37] | Suwansri S, Meullenet J F.2004. Physicochemical characterization and consumer acceptance by asian consumers of aromatic jasmine rice.J Food Sci, 69(1): 30-37. |
[38] | Tashiro T, Wardlaw I F.1991. The effect of high temperature on the accumulation of dry matter, carbon and nitrogen in the kernel of rice.Funct Plant Biol, 18(3): 259-265. |
[39] | Tong C, Chen Y L, Tang F F, Xu F F, Huang Y, Chen H, Bao J S.2014. Genetic diversity of amylose content and RVA pasting parameters in 20 rice accessions grown in Hainan, China.Food Chem, 161: 239-245. |
[40] | Tong C, Liu L, Waters D L E, Bao J S.2016. Association mapping and marker development of genes for starch lysophospholipid synthesis in rice.Rice Sci, 23(6): 287-296. |
[41] | Wan J, Zhou G H, Luo S J, Wang R, Liu C M, Zhang X, Liu F.2017. A study of the effect of amino acids on pasting and short-term retrogradation properties of rice starch based on molecular dynamics simulation. Starch Starke, 69: 1600238. |
[42] | Xu F F, Bao J S, He Q, Park Y J.2016. Genome-wide association study of eating and cooking qualities in different subpopulations of rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Genom, 17: 663. |
[43] | Yang F, Chen Y L, Tong C, Huang Y, Xu F F, Li K H, Croke H, Sun M, Bao J S.2014. Association mapping of starch physicochemical properties with starch synthesis-related gene markers in nonwaxy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breeding, 34(4): 1747-1763. |
[44] | Yang X Y, Lin Z M, Liu Z H, Alim M A, Bi J G, Li G H, Wang Q S, Wang S H, Ding Y F.2013. Physicochemical and sensory properties of japonica rice varied with production areas in China. J Integr Agric, 12(10): 1748-1756. |
[45] | Yoon M R, Rico C W, Koh H J, Kang M Y.2012. A study on the lipid components of rice in relation to palatability and storage.J Kor Soc Appl Biol Chem, 55(4): 515-521. |
[46] | Yu T Q, Jiang W Z, Ham T H, Chu S H, Lestari P, Lee J H, Kim M K, Xu F R, Han L Z, Dai L Y, Koh H J.2008. Comparison of grain quality traits between japonica rice cultivars from Korea and Yunnan Province of China. J Crop Sci Biotechnol, 11: 135-140. |
[47] | Zhang C Q, Zhou L H, Zhu Z B, Lu H W, Zhou X Z, Qian Y T, Li Q F, Lu Y, Gu M H, Liu Q Q.2016. Characterization of grain quality and starch fine structure of two japonica rice(Oryza sativa) cultivars with good sensory properties at different temperatures during the filling stage. J Agric Food Chem, 64: 4048-4057. |
[48] | Zhao C J, Xie J Q, Li L, Cao C J.2017. Comparative transcriptomic analysis in the paddy rice under storage and identification of differentially regulated genes in response to high temperature and humidity.J Agric Food Chem, 65: 8145-8153. |
[49] | Zhou Z K, Robards K, Helliwell S, Blanchard C.2002. Composition and functional properties of rice.Int J Food Sci Technol, 37(8): 849-868. |
[50] | Zhou Z K, Blanchard C, Helliwell S, Robards K.2003. Fatty acid composition of three rice varieties following storage.J Cereal Sci, 37(3): 327-335. |
[1] | Prathap V, Suresh KUMAR, Nand Lal MEENA, Chirag MAHESHWARI, Monika DALAL, Aruna TYAGI. Phosphorus Starvation Tolerance in Rice Through a Combined Physiological, Biochemical and Proteome Analysis [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 8-. |
[2] | Serena REGGI, Elisabetta ONELLI, Alessandra MOSCATELLI, Nadia STROPPA, Matteo Dell’ANNO, Kiril PERFANOV, Luciana ROSSI. Seed-Specific Expression of Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Dimer in Rice Engineered Lines [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 6-. |
[3] | Tan Jingyi, Zhang Xiaobo, Shang Huihui, Li Panpan, Wang Zhonghao, Liao Xinwei, Xu Xia, Yang Shihua, Gong Junyi, Wu Jianli. ORYZA SATIVA SPOTTED-LEAF 41 (OsSPL41) Negatively Regulates Plant Immunity in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 426-436. |
[4] | Liu Qiao, Qiu Linlin, Hua Yangguang, Li Jing, Pang Bo, Zhai Yufeng, Wang Dekai. LHD3 Encoding a J-Domain Protein Controls Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 437-448. |
[5] | Long Xinkang, Guan Chunmin, Wang Lin, Jia Liting, Fu Xiangjin, Lin Qinlu, Huang Zhengyu, Liu Chun. Rice Storage Proteins: Focus on Composition, Distribution, Genetic Improvement and Effects on Rice Quality [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(3): 207-221. |
[6] | Liu Yueran, Qu Jinsong, Wang Yufu, Yin Weixiao, Luo Chaoxi. bZIP Transcription Factor UvATF21 Mediates Vegetative Growth, Conidiation, Stress Tolerance and Is Required for Full Virulence of Rice False Smut Fungus Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(1): 50-57. |
[7] | Wang Cuili, Guo Wen, Hu Peisong, Wei Xiangjin, Tang Shaoqing, Jiao Guiai. Differences of Physicochemical Properties Between Chalky and Translucent Parts of Rice Grains [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(6): 577-588. |
[8] | Chen Eryong, Shen Bo. OsABT, a Rice WD40 Domain-Containing Protein, Is Involved in Abiotic Stress Tolerance [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(3): 247-256. |
[9] | Wang Rui, Zhang Dandan, Li Shengnan, Gao Jinlan, Han Liebao, Qiu Jinlong. Simple Bioassay for PAMP-Triggered Immunity in Rice Seedlings Based on Lateral Root Growth Inhibition [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(1): 67-75. |
[10] | Tao Wang, Lijuan Lou, Zeyu Li, Lianguang Shang, Quan Wang. Cloning and Characterization of Protein Prenyltransferase Alpha Subunit in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(6): 557-566. |
[11] | Yong Yang, Qiujun Lin, Xinyu Chen, Weifang Liang, Yuwen Fu, Zhengjin Xu, Yuanhua Wu, Xuming Wang, Jie Zhou, Chulang Yu, Chengqi Yan, Qiong Mei, Jianping Chen. Characterization and Proteomic Analysis of Novel Rice Lesion Mimic Mutant with Enhanced Disease Resistance [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(5): 466-478. |
[12] | Guangchen Zhang, Zimeng Liu, Youhong Liu, Noriyuki Kuya, Yuchen Hua, Hongru Shi, Weilin Zhao, Yuqing Han, Toshio Yamamoto, Wenfu Chen, Jian Sun. iTRAQ-Based Proteomics Investigation of Critical Response Proteins in Embryo and Coleoptile During Rice Anaerobic Germination [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(4): 391-401. |
[13] | Wenting Wang, Wenpei Cui, Ke Xu, Hui Gao, Haiyan Wei, Hongcheng Zhang. Effects of Early- and Late-Sowing on Starch Accumulation and Associated Enzyme Activities During Grain Filling Stage in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(2): 191-199. |
[14] | Yi Ding, Maike Wang, Yi Shen, Xiaoli Shu, Dianxing Wu, Wenjian Song. Physiochemical Properties of Resistant Starch and Its Enhancement Approaches in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(1): 31-42. |
[15] | Eo Seong-Hui, Ja Kim Song. Iksan526 Rice Callus Extract Induces Dedifferentiation of Rabbit Articular Chondrocytes via ERK1/2 and PI-3K/Akt Pathways [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(6): 504-514. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||